So, let's discuss some sports equipment which allows humans to swim faster than a human can
actually swim without it.Yes, you guessed it I am referring to the shark skin swimsuits,
the same ones which have now been banned from the sport and the Olympics. Now
then, there is a lot of hoopla on the Internet about this, lots of controversy,
and many now are claiming it is cheating and no different than taking steroids. Is
this really cheating?It could be considered cheating if only some folks are wearing them and
others do not have that advantage, and yet, being a track and field athlete, there
have always been differences in shoes, poles in tn pas cher pole vaulting, and the records have changed
drastically due to such things. Is that fair, they have less weight because they have
no legs. As a sports enthusiast and former athlete in track, I've always love to
follow sports, especially individual sports like boxing, wrestling, weight-lifting, bicycling, swimming, track, and the boxers,
wrestlers, lifters, cyclists, swimmers, and runners who put it all on the line. Those who
train and push themselves well beyond what seems to be humanly possible. Please consider all
this.Lance Winslow is the Founder of the Online Think Tank, a diverse group of achievers,
experts, innovators, entrepreneurs, thinkers, futurists, academics, dreamers, leaders, and general all around brilliant minds. Another
amputee tn requin challenge in sports is when the prosthesis actually gives then a major advantage in
sprinting. Lance Winslow hopes you've enjoyed today's discussion and topic. Is it cheating: yes, in
a way it is, even if it is out in the open and everyone knows
what's going on.Likewise we have weight lifters lifting in weight classes but they have no
legs, and they have world records in their weight class. Better shoes mean better endurance
and faster speeds, and each athlete picks their best combination.A swim suit that creates vortex
flows eliminating surface tension or friction will move through the water faster of course. And
if everyone has the same options, then eventually someone will better those for a newer
design. Whereas this does increase technology innovation, it does at some point become unfair to
the best athlete who may or may not have access to the newest design, is
that fair; NO. In fact, some physical sports scientists and researchers believe it gives them
a 15% to 20% advantage, and thus, other athletes and competing sprinters have complained.Why? Simple,
normal humans cannot compete with advanced sports hardware, just like those who take steroids have
an unfair advantage so too do those who have external equipment that is vastly superior
than the human body for a given sport. http://www.WorldThinkTank.net - Have an important subject to
discuss, contact Lance Winslow..
没有评论:
发表评论